About Our ResearchTier 1: Established TheoryIntermediate7 min read

The Science Behind PicRush: Research and Sources

The books, scientific studies, and research papers that inspired our game design.

Published by the PicRush Learning Team • Updated 2026-09-16

Quick Summary: What You Will Learn

  • We believe in honesty: scientific research inspires our game design, but playing a game is not a medical cure.
  • Every learning claim we make is based on published, peer-reviewed cognitive science.
  • We never use fake marketing claims like 'learn English 10x faster'.
  • We invite feedback from educators, teachers, and learners to keep making our tools better.
01

1. Our Promise: Real Science, Honest Facts

At PicRush, we believe learners deserve honesty, not marketing hype. Here is our promise to you:

Rule 1: Science Informs Us, But We Stay Honest. We use real cognitive science to build fun games. However, we never claim that playing a game will magically make you fluent overnight.

Rule 2: Real Sources Only. When we talk about how memory works, we link to real research papers published by university scientists.

Rule 3: No Fake Numbers. We never make up fake statistics like 'retain 2.5x more words in 3 days'. If a number cannot be proven in a real lab, we do not say it.

Rule 4: Clear Labels. We label every article so you know whether an idea is proven science or a PicRush design tip.

02

2. Key Scientific Studies and Books

If you want to read the real research papers yourself, here are our favorite sources:

On Pictures and Memory (Dual-Coding):

• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

• Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.

On Quizzing Yourself and Active Recall:

• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210.

• Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying. Science, 331(6018), 772–775.

On How the Eyes Scan Images:

• Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234.

• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.

On English Levels and Word Frequency:

• Council of Europe (2001, 2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Strasbourg.

• Capel, A. (2012). Completing the English Vocabulary Profile. Cambridge English Research Notes, 49, 1–6.

Scientific Sources for This Guide

We base our tips on published cognitive science papers and international language standards:

Main StudyCouncil of Europe, Allan Paivio, Hermann Ebbinghaus, Max Wertheimer.
Supporting ResearchRoediger & Karpicke (2006), Wagemans et al. (2012), Rayner (1998, 2009), Capel (2012).
Curriculum Progression

Continue Your Learning Journey

Deepen your knowledge with complementary guides from our curriculum

Ready to Practice What You Learned?

Turn what you just read into real vocabulary practice. Test your memory speed with thousands of fun photographic puzzles.

Play Solo Arena

Quick, timed sprint rounds designed to train your recall speed and test how fast you can find words.

Start Solo Practice
Play with Friends

Create a custom room with your own timers and play live party games with friends or classmates.

Host Party Room